2014年7月8日 星期二

Graduates Cautioned: Don’t Shut Out Opposing Views 大學生們,請包容畢業典禮演講嘉賓

這篇有點翻譯腔,有空再研究。




大學生們,請包容畢業典禮演講嘉賓

畢業演講2014年07月08日
順時針自左上,哥倫比亞大學演講嘉賓丹·法特曼;史密斯學院演講嘉賓露絲·西蒙斯,前史密斯學院和布朗大學校長;埃默里大學演講嘉賓約翰·劉易斯,國會議員、民權領袖;歌手阿瑞莎·富蘭克林和前紐約市市長邁克爾·布隆伯格在哈佛。
順時針自左上,哥倫比亞大學演講嘉賓丹·法特曼;史密斯學院演講嘉賓露絲·西蒙斯,前史密斯學院和布朗大學校長;埃默里大學演講嘉賓約翰·劉易斯,國會議員、民權領袖;歌手阿瑞莎·富蘭克林和前紐約市市長邁克爾·布隆伯格在哈佛。
Clockwise from top left: Char Smullyan, Smith College, Emory University and Brian Snyder/Reuters
今年的畢業典禮演講嘉賓大多是因為缺席而成為新聞人物的。左翼抗議者大肆抨擊學院和大學邀請的演講人,在一些大學,他們如願以償,趕走了預約的嘉賓。
布蘭代斯大學(Brandeis University)撤銷了對索馬里出生的活動家阿亞安·希爾西·阿里(Ayaan Hirsi Ali)的邀請。如潮的抗議也讓其他演講人打了退黨鼓:前國務卿康多莉扎·賴斯(Condoleezza Rice)、國際貨幣基金組織(IMF)總裁克里斯蒂娜·拉加德(Christine Lagarde)、加州大學伯克利分校(University of California, Berkeley)前校長羅伯特·柏吉諾(Robert J. Birgeneau)分別謝絕了羅格斯大學(Rutgers University)、史密斯學院(Smith College)和哈弗福德學院(Haverford College)的盛情邀請。
他們被迫退出的遭遇,縈繞在許多演講人的心頭,其中包括一些在抗議獲得成功的高校發表演講的嘉賓。談及這一話題時,一些演講人開起了玩笑,其他人則顯得非常嚴肅;一些人轉彎抹角,也有人針鋒相對。
他們大多表示反對,針對政治觀念正統思維發出警告,並堅稱,無論學生對這些演講人持有何種異議,它們都無法逾越其他人宣揚反面觀點的基本權利。(反對希爾西·阿里是因為她詆毀伊斯蘭教;反對賴斯是因為她在伊拉克戰爭中扮演的角色;反對拉加德是因為國際貨幣基金組織對待窮國的態度,反對柏吉諾是因為加州大學伯克利分校曾經粗暴對待「佔領運動」示威者。)
近幾年備受青睞的某些畢業演講主題已經消退,比如金融體系的失效,美國在世界上的強勢地位引發的道德困境。另一些主題則逐漸流行開來。
演講人勸告年輕人要敢於冒險,追求失敗,擁抱不確定性和變化。他們指出,長期以來信奉這些價值觀的高新技術領域已經變得越來越重要,這種文化對非科技職業生涯的影響力也與日俱增。
許多演講人試圖打消畢業生可能出現的自滿情緒——輕微打擊一下他們的自尊心,提醒他們擁有多麼好的運氣,哀嘆持續不斷的經濟不平等,並勉勵他們努力工作,追求遠大理想。
哈佛學院(Harvard College)
邁克爾·布隆伯格(Michael R. Bloomberg),前紐約市市長,彭博通訊社(Bloomberg L.P.)控股股東
「對觀念的不寬容,無論是自由派還是保守派的觀念,不僅有悖於個人權利和自由社會,同時也是好大學和一流學術的對立面。一些大學校園,包括哈佛在內,目前涌動着這樣一種思潮:只有當學術研究符合特定的正義觀時,學者才應該獲得資助。用審查一詞來形容這種觀點再恰當不過。它絕對是一種現代版的麥卡錫主義。想想這有多麼諷刺:在20世紀50年代,是右翼在試圖壓制左翼的思想。今天,在許多大學校園,自由主義者正在不遺餘力地壓制保守主義思想,即使保守派教師眼看就要淪為瀕危物種。最能體現這股潛流的地方,也許莫過於常青藤盟校(Ivy League)。……
「要求學者——同樣也包括畢業典禮演講人——符合特定的政治標準,破壞了大學存在的全部意義。」
史密斯學院
露絲·西蒙斯(Ruth Simmons),前史密斯學院和布朗大學(Brown University)校長
「我感覺有必要接受請求,代替克里斯蒂娜·拉加德夫人來這裡發表演講。……
「通過與對立觀點的碰撞,一個人的聲音會越來越強大。在離開史密斯學院後的第一年裡,我不得不堅持要求布朗大學同意邀請這樣一個講者,雖然這個人的每一個主張都是危險的,讓我個人感到是一種極大的侵犯。事實上他至今仍認為黑人繼續被奴役下去處境會更好。出席他的演講會並聆聽他的觀點,對我個人而言是一件很有挑戰性的事情,但它絲毫不會動搖我懷抱的一個信念——容許他人聽到他闡述的這些令人髮指的觀點,是絕對必要的。我本可以避免這場演講,因為我早就知道他的觀點,但這樣做無異於把個人的舒適感凌駕於一種自由之上,而這自由的價值是如此之大,以至於聆聽他那些不受歡迎的訊息,算不上是多麼大的犧牲。保護言論自由、公開演說和抗議的價值是大學的一項特殊職責。觀點和意識形態的碰撞乃學術機構天性使然。」
哈弗福德學院
威廉·鮑文(William G. Bowen),前普林斯頓大學(Princeton University)校長,前安德魯·梅隆基金會(Andrew W. Mellon)總裁
「我無意冒犯莊嚴的抗議權——那是我願畢生去捍衛的,但我還是想說,那位反對授予柏吉諾名譽學位的抗議領袖犯了一個嚴重錯誤——他說,柏吉諾決定不出席這場畢業典禮代表着一場『小勝』。它所代表的絕不是那麼一回事。就像許多從事高等教育的人士一樣,我也認為對於哈弗福德學院來說,這樣的結果是不折不扣的失敗。任何一個認為有必要聆聽多種觀點並相互尊重的人——我想我們大多是這樣的人,都不會覺得這是場勝利。」
加州大學伯克利分校
史蒂芬·伊森伯格(Steven L. Isenberg),作家,教授,前出版人
「一些學生和家長或許心存一個跟職場和英語專業有關的疑問:『他們需要我們嗎?』我最近正在再次拜讀格雷厄姆·格林(Graham Greene)的自傳,他是我最喜歡的小說家之一,其中有一句話讓我深感震撼:『也許在一個人活到70歲,隨時等待上帝召喚之前,沒有哪一年會像正規教育結束,開始找工作並對整個未來肩負起個人責任的那一年那麼不吉利。』我記得,當我大學畢業,不得不離開我在本科生涯構建的連貫性和幸福感的時候,我感受到一種難言的失落感。我當時六神無主,不知道接下來該做什麼。作為我們家的第一個大學生,我對世界的諸多可能性所知不多,只是任由興趣的指引,缺乏一個確定的方向。但我的確知道怎樣讀書,也熱愛讀書,我喜歡寫東西,不管我的寫作需要我付出多大努力。於是,我就依靠這兩個要素樹立起信心,我覺得,它們肯定會成為我未來工作的基石。」
阿爾布萊特學院(Albright College)
鮑勃·加菲爾德(Bob Garfield),記者
「我簡直無法表達我對你們有多麼失望。早在三個月前,阿爾布萊特學院就宣布我將成為你們的畢業典禮嘉賓,但直到今天,也沒見你們抗議一下。」
在其他大學,「學生們都在舉行憤怒的抗議活動,簽署請願書,向可能的演講人發送要求清單,道義譴責此起彼伏。我得到了什麼?收費公路的路線指引。真是的,難道就沒有人在谷歌(Google)上搜索一下我的信息?我當了37年的記者,難道就沒有說過或寫過什麼冒犯你的感情,挑起義憤的東西?不可能沒有吧。哎,你知道取消邀請將對我的履歷起到多大的作用嗎?」
哈維瑪德學院(Harvey Mudd College)
貝絲·夏皮羅(Beth Shapiro),進化生物學家
「你接受的獨特教育已經為你邁向創新前沿做好了準備。這既是一個好消息,也是壞消息。說它是好消息是因為,你很可能會找到一份待遇優厚,能夠讓你獲得智力滿足感的工作。說它是壞消息是因為,你從一開始想好的,為之努力訓練的東西或許已經不復存在。五年前,當你們正在斟酌應該上哪所大學的時候,還幾乎沒有移動應用程序開發商或大數據架構師這種工作,當然也沒有專註於社交媒體的首席聆聽官。很難想像未來五年將變成什麼樣子,但展望未來是一件很有趣的事情。生物學和技術是否將出現博格式整合?無人駕駛轎車是否會解決交通堵塞問題?誰知道呢,但你們將推動這一切變為現實。這將是一段非凡的旅程,只要你願意承擔一定風險,並走出你的舒適區。機會來臨時,一定要抓住它。」
北卡羅萊納大學教堂山分校(The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
阿圖爾·葛文德(Atul Gawande), 醫生,作家
「說到底,我們都有一種內在的需要去追求比我們自身更重要的目的,值得為之犧牲的目的。人們常說,『尋找你的激情。』但人生並非如此簡單。光靠滿腔激情是不夠的。僅僅為慾望而存在會讓你感到空虛,沒有充實感,因為我們的慾望轉瞬即逝,而且無法滿足。你需要一種歸屬感。讓人生不再缺乏意義的唯一方式,就是把你自己視為某個更大事物的組成部分,比如家庭、社區或社會。這是通過大學教育你能夠做的最好的事情。大學讓這樣做變得容易。它讓你自動在這個世界獲得一個讓你體驗歸屬感的位置。你即將加入的所謂『現實世界』做不到這一點。」
「我在大學畢業後逐漸意識到,追尋人生意義其實是在世界上追尋一個位置,而不是一種理念。在這個位置上,你可以為某個改善其他人境遇的事業貢獻一份微薄之力。它或許是一間你從教的教室,一家你工作的企業,一個你居住的社區。最重要的是,如果你發現你停留在一個你不再關心的地方,一個你只關心自己的地方,那就趕緊離開吧。」
康奈爾大學(Cornell University)
埃德·赫爾姆斯(Ed Helms),演員,笑星
「我跟這所備受推崇的學術機構的主要聯繫是,我曾經在NBC劇集《辦公室》(The Office)中扮演一個很不招人喜歡的康奈爾大學畢業生。這很有趣,今年,康多莉扎·賴斯謝絕了羅格斯大學的演講邀請,因為學生們抗議她在伊拉克戰爭中扮演的爭議性角色。與此同時,我讓這所學校在全國電視觀眾面前承受了長達八年的羞辱,沒人抗議。當我接收演講邀請函的時候,我戰戰兢兢地打開電子郵件,因為我想我可能惹上了官司。」
「請大家記住,要當一個傻瓜。聽起來很瘋狂——所謂傻瓜,是說一個人缺乏良好的判斷力。但我想告訴你們,良好的判斷力被過度高估了。智慧往往是冷嘲熱諷這個詞的一種華麗表達,而愚蠢則是喜悅,驚訝和好奇等詞的一種謙卑說法。蕭伯納(George Bernard Shaw)說,『一個人是通過搖搖晃晃,讓自己出醜而學會滑冰的。事實上,在所有事情上,一個人都是通過堅定不移地讓自己出洋相而獲得進步的。』我完全同意。事實證明,這個世界給我們提供了幾乎無窮無盡的當傻瓜的機會。」
哥倫比亞大學(Columbia University)
丹·法特曼(Dan Futterman),演員、作家
「我是一個幸運兒。在1967年全世界誕生的大約1億名嬰兒中,我很幸運地出生在了最富有的國度,有一對受過良好教育、身體健康的父母。我的父母不僅自己上過兩所世界上最好的大學,而且也打算(至少希望)他們的孩子也這樣做。此外,我的家裡還擺放着許多書籍。你們中的許多人很可能擁有類似的家庭背景。你們的人生抽到了一張幸運牌。這樣說並不是想讓你們難堪,也無意貶損你們在過去四年的不懈努力和學業成就。我只是想陳述一個事實。我們許多人,甚至可以說大多數人,都來自一個尊享俱樂部。這並不意味着我們更值得擁有這種出身。它意味着我們更幸運。隨着收入和機會在社會頂層不斷擴展,在社會底層不斷收縮,這個尊享俱樂部只會變得更加排外。請允許我向那些家庭出身並不優越的同學表達我由衷的欽佩之情。你們已經抓住了從這裡順利畢業的渺茫機會,那是我從來沒有面對過的困境。但是,此刻你們也已經進入一個尊享俱樂部,從這個世界上最偉大的一間大學畢業。與這種特權相伴的是責任,你們所有人都肩負着一種責任。不要把你背後的門關上。你們每個人都有責任轉過身去,拉其他人一把,幫助他們走上樓梯,穿過那扇門。」
埃默里大學(Emory University)
約翰·劉易斯(John Lewis),國會議員、民權領袖
「我見過那些標牌,上面寫着『白人男性』,『有色男性』,『白人女性』,『有色女性』,『白人等候區』和『有色人等候區』。回家後,我問我的母親、父親、祖父母和曾祖父母,『為什麼要這樣區分?』他們總是說:『事情就是這樣。不要礙事。不要惹麻煩。』……
「1957年,17歲的我遇到了羅莎·帕克斯(Rosa Parks)。18歲那年,我遇到了馬丁·路德·金(Martin Luther King Jr.),這兩個人鼓勵我要敢於礙事,敢於惹麻煩。所以,我今天早上來到這裡,是想對你們說,你們已經在這個美麗的校園接受了一流教育,你們肯定找到了一種礙事的方式,一種惹麻煩的方式——好的、有必要的麻煩。」
「有一個可悲的謬論,說成功主要是由一種被稱為『能力』的東西決定的。」耶倫說。
「有一個可悲的謬論,說成功主要是由一種被稱為『能力』的東西決定的。」耶倫說。
Richard Perry/The New York Times
紐約大學(New York University)
珍妮特·耶倫(Janet L. Yellen),美聯儲主席
「有一個可悲的謬論,說成功主要是由一種被稱為『能力』的東西決定的。但研究表明,即使這些素質獲得最精確的衡量,它們也無法可靠地預測一個人的學業或就業表現。心理學家安吉拉·李·達克沃斯(Angela Lee Duckworth)認為,真正重要的是一種她稱之為『剛毅』的品質——始終不渝地致力於一項長期目標,哪怕遇到再大的挫折也毫不氣餒。我認為這種品質尤為重要的一個特徵是,情勢所迫時願意表明立場。這種情勢或許不會來得那麼頻繁,但每個人在日常生活中總會遇到一些至關重要的時刻,在這個時候,你務必要有勇氣站出來,捍衛你自身的信念。」
布萊恩特大學(Bryant University)
理乍得·W·費舍爾(Richard W. Fisher),達拉斯聯邦儲備銀行(Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas)主席兼首席執行官
「我們的母親會說,『永遠不要讓你的大腦沖昏你的頭腦。』這句雙關語聽起來很可怕,但它傳達了一個非常深刻的訊息:為了獲得成功,你需要正確看待你獲得的一流教育和你擁有的驕人天賦。智力和天賦是必要的,但僅憑它們還不足以確保人生的成功。在企業、大學和政府機構,我們一次又一次看到這樣的例子:智力超群的男男女女起初躊躇滿志,一往無前,但最終卻與成功失之交臂。箇中原因是,他們已經忘記了像開發智商那樣專註地開發自己的情商。我衷心建議你們要像駕馭你們的智商那樣,努力地擴展你的情商。」
迦太基學院(Carthage College) 
亞歷克西斯·奧海寧(Alexis Ohanian),社交化新聞網站Reddit聯合創始人
「如果你不知道自己正在做什麼,那沒有什麼大不了的,只要相信自己的直覺,儘力做出最佳判斷就好。上天不會給你分配一個進度表。你需要使用你掌握的知識,你擁有的資源,去搞清楚這個問題,去破解它。我的意思是,在大部分時間裡,我仍然不知道我在做什麼。」……
「你要弄清楚這個問題,而失敗將成為這一進程的組成部分。你們今天能夠坐在這裡,是因為你們擅長在考試里不去失敗,不是嗎?這是你擅於不失敗的人生之旅的頂峰。這場畢業典禮後,再無平均績點(GPA)可供參照,只會有數不勝數的挫折,罄竹難書的失敗。當大家介紹我時,沒有人說我是『我的手機菜單(My Mobile Menu,又稱Mmm)』的創始人,因為那是我們創立的第一家公司。在創辦Reddit前大約一年半的時間裡,史蒂夫和我整天鼓搗一個最終無疾而終的創意。但那沒關係。失敗也是一個選項。」
本文最初發表於2014年6月27日。
翻譯:任文科

Graduates Cautioned: Don’t Shut Out Opposing Views

Commencement SpeakersJuly 08, 2014

Clockwise from top left, the actor Dan Futterman at Columbia University; Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College and Brown University, at Smith College; John Lewis, congressman and civil rights leader, at Emory University; and the singer Aretha Franklin and Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York City mayor, at Harvard.
Clockwise from top left: Char Smullyan, Smith College, Emory University and Brian Snyder/Reuters
Commencement speakers made news this year mostly by their absence. Protesters on the left assailed speakers who had been invited by colleges and universities, and in some cases, they got their wish, driving away the intended guests.
Brandeis University rescinded its invitation to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the Somali-born activist. Others withdrew in the face protests: Condoleezza Rice, the former secretary of state, from Rutgers University; Christine Lagarde, head of the International Monetary Fund, from Smith College; and Robert J. Birgeneau, former chancellor of the University of California, Berkeley, from Haverford College.
This topic of scuttled speakers was on the minds of many of those who did speak, including some who addressed colleges where the protests succeeded. Some approached the issue humorously and others seriously, some obliquely and others head-on.
Mostly, they expressed disapproval, warning against political orthodoxy, and insisting that the principle of airing opposing views should have trumped whatever objections there were to the speakers. (Ms. Hirsi Ali was opposed for her denigration of Islam, Ms. Rice for her role in the Iraq war, Ms. Lagarde for the I.M.F.'s treatment of poor nations, and Mr. Birgeneau for Berkeley’s rough treatment of Occupy protesters.)
Some of the favored graduation themes of recent years have faded — the failings of the financial system, the moral dimensions of a muscular American stance in the world — while others have flourished.
Speakers exhorted young people to take risks, court failure, and embrace uncertainty and change. They noted the growing importance of high-tech fields that have long embraced those values, and the growing influence of that culture on non-tech careers.
And many speakers sought to shake graduates out of any complacency — deflating their egos a bit, reminding them how fortunate they are, lamenting persistent economic inequality, and urging them to work hard and pursue higher causes.
HARVARD COLLEGE
Michael R. Bloomberg, former New York City mayor and majority owner of Bloomberg L.P.
“Intolerance of ideas, whether liberal or conservative, is antithetical to individual rights and free societies, and it is no less antithetical to great universities and first-rate scholarship. There is an idea floating around college campuses, including here at Harvard, that scholars should be funded only if their work conforms to a particular view of justice. There’s a word for that idea: censorship. And it is just a modern-day form of McCarthyism. Think about the irony: In the 1950s, the right wing was attempting to repress left-wing ideas. Today, on many college campuses, it is liberals trying to repress conservative ideas, even as conservative faculty members are at risk of becoming an endangered species. And perhaps nowhere is that more true than here in the Ivy League. ...
“Requiring scholars — and commencement speakers, for that matter — to conform to certain political standards undermines the whole purpose of a university.”
SMITH COLLEGE
Ruth Simmons, former president of Smith College and Brown University
“I felt it important to answer the request to stand in for the announced speaker, Madame Christine Lagarde. ...
“One’s voice grows stronger in encounters with opposing views. My first year after leaving Smith, I had to insist that Brown permit a speaker whose every assertion was dangerous and deeply offensive to me on a personal level. Indeed, he maintained that blacks were better off having been enslaved. Attending his talk and hearing his perspective was personally challenging, but not in the least challenging to my convictions about the absolute necessity of permitting others to hear him say these heinous things. I could have avoided the talk, as his ideas were known to me, but to have done so would have been to choose personal comfort over a freedom whose value is so great that hearing his unwelcome message could hardly be assessed as too great a cost. Universities have a special obligation to protect free speech, open discourse and the value of protest. The collision of views and ideologies is in the DNA of the academic enterprise.”
HAVERFORD COLLEGE
William G. Bowen, former president of Princeton University and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
“I want to suggest, with all due respect for the venerable right to protest — which I would defend to the end — that it is a serious mistake for a leader of the protest against Birgeneau’s proposed honorary degree to claim that Birgeneau’s decision not to come represents a ‘small victory.’ It represents nothing of the kind. In keeping with the views of many others in higher education, I regard this outcome as a defeat, pure and simple, for Haverford — no victory for anyone who believes, as I think most of us do, in both openness to many points of view and mutual respect.”
THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Steven L. Isenberg, writer, professor and former publisher
“Some of you and your parents may have in mind a question as to the world of work and English majors: ‘Do they need us?’ I was reading again, recently, the autobiography of one of my favorite novelists, Graham Greene, and was struck by this sentence: ‘Perhaps, until one starts at the age of 70 to live on borrowed time, no year will seem again quite so ominous as the one when formal education ends and the moment arrives to find employment and bear personal responsibility for the whole future.’ I remembered when I graduated feeling a certain sense of loss at having to leave the coherence and happiness I had built up in undergraduate life. I was unsettled by not knowing what I would do next. The first in my family to go to college, I had small knowledge of the world’s possibilities and only impulses of interests, rather than a settled direction. But I did know how to read and loved to do so, and I liked to write, however much work I knew my writing needed, so I banked on those two elements for confidence, feeling they must be a foundation for whatever was to be ahead.”
ALBRIGHT COLLEGE
Bob Garfield, journalist
“I just can’t tell you how disappointed I am with you. It was three months ago that Albright announced me as your guest, and not a peep from you.”
At other colleges, “students mounted furious protests, signed petitions, dispatched lists of demands to prospective speakers, in letters boiling with moral outrage. And what do I get? Directions from the turnpike. Come on, did nobody Google me? Have I said or written nothing in 37 years as a journalist to offend your sensibilities and provoke righteous indignation? Oh, man. Do you have any idea — any idea — what a disinvitation would have done for my profile?”
HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE
Beth Shapiro, evolutionary biologist
“Your unique education has prepared you for careers at the cutting edge of innovation. This is both good news and bad news. It’s good news because you’re probably going to find a job, it will pay well, and it will be intellectually fulfilling. It’s bad news because whatever you thought you were training for when you started this exercise might not actually exist anymore. Five years ago, when you guys were deciding where to go to college, there were very few mobile-app developers or big-data architects, and there certainly weren’t any chief listening officers for social media outlets. It’s hard to imagine where the next five years will go, but it’s kind of fun to do so. Will there be a Borg-esque integration of biology and technology, or self-driving cars that get rid of traffic congestion? Who knows, but you guys are going to be among the people that are actually making it happen. And it’ll be awesome, as long as you’re willing to take some risks and step outside of your comfort zone. When an opportunity arises, take it.”
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
Atul Gawande, doctor and writer
“Ultimately, it turns out we all have an intrinsic need to pursue purposes larger than ourselves, purposes worth making sacrifices for. People often say, ‘Find your passion.’ But there’s more to it than that. Not all passions are enough. Just existing for your desires feels empty and insufficient, because our desires are fleeting and insatiable. You need a loyalty. The only way life is not meaningless is to see yourself as part of something greater: a family, a community, a society. And that is the best part of what college has allowed you to do. College made it easy. It gave you an automatic place in the world where you could feel part of something greater. The supposedly ‘real world’ you are joining does not. ...
“One thing I came to realize after college was that the search for purpose is really a search for a place, not an idea. It is a search for a location in the world where you want to be part of making things better for others in your own small way. It could be a classroom where you teach, a business where you work, a neighborhood where you live. The key is, if you find yourself in a place where you stop caring — where your greatest concern becomes only you — get out of there.”
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
Ed Helms, actor and comedian
“I’m a guy whose primary connection to this venerable institution is having portrayed a rather hard-to-like Cornell alum on the NBC television show ‘The Office.’ It’s interesting, Condoleezza Rice backed out of speaking at Rutgers this year because students protested over her controversial role in the Iraq war. Meanwhile, I directly embarrassed this school for eight years on national television, and no protests. When I got the invitation to speak, I was scared to open the email because I thought it might be a lawsuit. ...
“Please, remember to be a fool. Sounds crazy — a fool is by definition a person who lacks good sense or judgment. But I’m here to tell you that good sense and judgment are highly overrated. Wisdom is too often just a fancy word for cynicism. And foolishness is a condescending word for joy, wonder and curiosity. George Bernard Shaw said, ‘A man learns to skate by staggering about and making a fool of himself. Indeed, he progresses in all things by resolutely making a fool of himself.’ I couldn’t agree more. Turns out, the world provides us with virtually infinite opportunities to be a fool.”
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
Dan Futterman, actor and writer
“I am a lucky person. Of the roughly 100 million babies born worldwide in 1967, I was lucky enough to be born into the wealthiest country. Born to educated, healthy parents. To parents who had not only gone to two of the great colleges in the world, but who intended, or at least hoped, for their children to do the same. To parents who had books in their home. There’s a very good chance that many of you come from similar backgrounds. You drew a lucky card in life. That’s not to embarrass you or to diminish how hard you’ve worked or how much you’ve learned these past four years. That’s simply to state a fact. Many of us — most of us — come from an exclusive club. That doesn’t mean we’re more worthy. It means we’re more lucky. This exclusive club is only becoming more exclusive as incomes and opportunity at the top of our society expand, and incomes and opportunity at the bottom contract. For those of you who didn’t come from privileged backgrounds ... let me tell you how much I admire you. You have bested long odds to be here today, long odds which I never faced. But you, too, have now entered an exclusive club, graduates of one of the great universities of the world. And with that privilege, you have responsibility, all of you do. Do not shut the door behind you. Each of you has a responsibility to turn around, give someone else a hand up, up the stairs and through the door.”
EMORY UNIVERSITY
John Lewis, congressman and civil rights leader
“I saw those signs that said ‘white men,’ ‘colored men,’ ‘white women,’ ‘colored women,’ ‘white waiting,’ ‘colored waiting.’ I would come home and ask my mother, my father, my grandparents, my great-grandparents, ‘Why?’ They would say: ‘That’s the way it is. Don’t get in the way. Don’t get in trouble.’ ...
“In 1957, I met Rosa Parks at the age of 17. In 1958, at the age of 18, I met Martin Luther King Jr., and these two individuals inspired me to get in the way, to get in trouble. So I come here to say to you this morning, on this beautiful campus, with your great education, you must find a way to get in the way. You must find a way to get in trouble — good trouble, necessary trouble.”

 “There is an unfortunate myth that success is mainly determined by something called ‘ability,’ ” said Janet L. Yellen. 
Richard Perry/The New York Times
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
Janet L. Yellen, Federal Reserve chairwoman
“There is an unfortunate myth that success is mainly determined by something called ‘ability.’ But research indicates that our best measures of these qualities are unreliable predictors of performance in academics or employment. Psychologist Angela Lee Duckworth says that what really matters is a quality she calls ‘grit’ — an abiding commitment to work hard toward long-range goals and to persevere through the setbacks that come along the way. One aspect of grit that I think is particularly important is the willingness to take a stand when circumstances demand it. Such circumstances may not be all that frequent, but in every life, there will be crucial moments when having the courage to stand up for what you believe will be immensely important.”
BRYANT UNIVERSITY
Richard W. Fisher, president and chief executive officer of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
“Our mother would say, ‘Never let your brains go to your head.’ The pun is horrific, but the message is profound: To achieve success, you will need to keep your superb education and your considerable talent in perspective. Brains and the gift of talent are necessary, but they are insufficient for success in life. Time and again, in business and universities and government, we see instances in which women and men of towering intellect get far at first, but ultimately snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. They do so because they have forgotten to develop their emotional quotient with the same devotion they applied to developing their intelligence quotient. My heartfelt advice to you is to work as hard on expanding your E.Q. as you have on harnessing your I.Q.”
CARTHAGE COLLEGE
Alexis Ohanian, co-founder of Reddit
“It’s O.K. to not really know what you’re doing, and just trust your gut. Make the best judgment you can. There’s not going to be a syllabus assigned to you. It’s going to be using whatever knowledge you’ve gained, whatever resources you have, to just figure it out, to just hack it. I mean, most of the time, I still don’t know what I’m doing. ...
“You are going to figure it out, and failure is going to be part of the process. You’re all here because you’re good at not failing, right? This is the culmination of doing a great job at not failing. There are no G.P.A.s after this. There’s going to be lots of setbacks. There’s going to be lots of failures. No one introduces me as the founder of My Mobile Menu, also known as Mmm, because that was our first company. Before we started Reddit, Steve and I started that, and for a year and a half worked on something that went nowhere. But that’s O.K. Failure is an option.”



沒有留言: