Education 教育人行道

2010年12月30日 星期四

上海學生考高分是中國教育的失敗

上海學生考高分是中國教育的失敗
北大附中國際部主任江學勤認為﹐中國學生在PISA考試中的高分並不一定說明中國教育的成功﹐相反﹐它說明中國的應試教育模式亟待改革。


Shanghai Schools’ Approach Pushes Students to Top of Tests

Ryan Pyle for The New York Times

Discipline issues are rare at the middle school linked to the Jing’An Teachers’ College in Shanghai. The city is thought to have China’s best schools.

By DAVID BARBOZA
Published: December 29, 2010
SHANGHAI — In Li Zhen’s ninth-grade mathematics class here last week, the morning drill was geometry. Students at the middle school affiliated with Jing’An Teachers’ College were asked to explain the relative size of geometric shapes by using Euclid’s theorem of parallelograms.
Enlarge This Image
Ryan Pyle for The New York Times

A teacher instructed students in class at the middle school associated with Jing’An Teachers’ College in central Shanghai.

“Who in this class can tell me how to demonstrate two lines are parallel without using a proportional segment?” Ms. Li called out to about 40 students seated in a cramped classroom.

One by one, a series of students at this medium-size public school raised their hands. When Ms. Li called on them, they each stood politely by their desks and usually answered correctly. They returned to their seats only when she told them to sit down.

Educators say this disciplined approach helps explain the announcement this month that 5,100 15-year-olds in Shanghai outperformed students from about 65 countries on an international standardized test that measured math, science and reading competency.

American students came in between 15th and 31st place in the three categories. France and Britain also fared poorly.

Experts said comparing scores from countries and cities of different sizes is complicated. They also said that the Shanghai scores were not representative of China, since this fast-growing city of 20 million is relatively affluent. Still, they were impressed by the high scores from students in Shanghai.

The results were seen as another sign of China’s growing competitiveness. The United States rankings are a “wake-up call,” said Arne Duncan, the secretary of education.

Although it was the first time China had taken part in the test, which was administered by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, based in Paris, the results bolstered this country’s reputation for producing students with strong math and science skills.

Many educators were also surprised by the city’s strong reading scores, which measured students’ proficiency in their native Chinese.

The Shanghai students performed well, experts say, for the same reason students from other parts of Asia — including South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong — do: Their education systems are steeped in discipline, rote learning and obsessive test preparation.

Public school students in Shanghai often remain at school until 4 p.m., watch very little television and are restricted by Chinese law from working before the age of 16.

“Very rarely do children in other countries receive academic training as intensive as our children do,” said Sun Baohong, an authority on education at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. “So if the test is on math and science, there’s no doubt Chinese students will win the competition.”

But many educators say China’s strength in education is also a weakness. The nation’s education system is too test-oriented, schools here stifle creativity and parental pressures often deprive children of the joys of childhood, they say.

“These are two sides of the same coin: Chinese schools are very good at preparing their students for standardized tests,” Jiang Xueqin, a deputy principal at Peking University High School in Beijing, wrote in an opinion article published in The Wall Street Journal shortly after the test results were announced. “For that reason, they fail to prepare them for higher education and the knowledge economy.”

In an interview, Mr. Jiang said Chinese schools emphasized testing too much, and produced students who lacked curiosity and the ability to think critically or independently.

“It creates very narrow-minded students,” he said. “But what China needs now is entrepreneurs and innovators.”

This is a common complaint in China. Educators say an emphasis on standardized tests is partly to blame for the shortage of innovative start-ups in China. And executives at global companies operating here say they have difficulty finding middle managers who can think creatively and solve problems.

In many ways, the system is a reflection of China’s Confucianist past. Children are expected to honor and respect their parents and teachers.

“Discipline is rarely a problem,” said Ding Yi, vice principal at the middle school affiliated with Jing’An Teachers’ College. “The biggest challenge is a student who chronically fails to do his homework.”

While the quality of schools varies greatly in China (rural schools often lack sufficient money, and dropout rates can be high), schools in major cities typically produce students with strong math and science skills.

Shanghai is believed to have the nation’s best school system, and many students here gain admission to America’s most selective colleges and universities.

In Shanghai, teachers are required to have a teaching certificate and to undergo a minimum of 240 hours of training; higher-level teachers can be required to have up to 540 hours of training. There is a system of incentives and merit pay, just like the systems in some parts of the United States.

“Within a teacher’s salary package, 70 percent is basic salary,” said Xiong Bingqi, a professor of education at Shanghai Jiaotong University. “The other 30 percent is called performance salary.”

Still, teacher salaries are modest, about $750 a month before bonuses and allowances — far less than what accountants, lawyers or other professionals earn.

While Shanghai schools are renowned for their test preparation skills, administrators here are trying to broaden the curriculums and extend more freedom to local districts. The Jing’An school, one of about 150 schools in Shanghai that took part in the international test, was created 12 years ago to raise standards in an area known for failing schools.

The principal, Zhang Renli, created an experimental school that put less emphasis on math and allows children more free time to play and experiment. The school holds a weekly talent show, for example.

The five-story school building, which houses Grades eight and nine in a central district of Shanghai, is rather nondescript. Students wear rumpled school uniforms, classrooms are crowded and lunch is bused in every afternoon. But the school, which operates from 8:20 a.m. to 4 p.m. on most days, is considered one of the city’s best middle schools.

In Shanghai, most students begin studying English in first grade. Many middle school students attend extra-credit courses after school or on Saturdays. A student at Jing’An, Zhou Han, 14, said she entered writing and speech-making competitions and studied the erhu, a Chinese classical instrument. She also has a math tutor.

“I’m not really good at math,” she said. “At first, my parents wanted me to take it, but now I want to do it.”

Bao Beibei contributed research.

張貼者: 人事物 於 凌晨12:21 沒有留言:

2010年12月28日 星期二

台灣高教問題 (潘震澤 2010)

潘震澤老師的專欄我幾乎沒看 可是我佩服他 是少數的有心人 此文可知他今年的主要論點 所以轉載之

***

觀念平台-莫道書生空議論

  • 2010-12-29
  • 中國時報
  • 【潘震澤】

 又是一年將屆,筆者有幸每兩周在此專欄寫篇文章,發表些書生之見;如今趁歲末作一番回顧,也算是檢討過去,策勵將來。

 綜觀今年發表的二十六篇文章,與學術生態有關的文章最多,共有十一篇;再加上三篇談大學教育,則高達十四篇。由於自己身在這一行已有三十來年,碰上與學術界有關的新聞自然是比一般人敏感得多,也常有話可說。

 這些文章裡,有好些篇與教授薪水及研究經費有關。本國教授的薪資比不上許多國家是事實,但在國內也算中高收入群;再加上一些隱形收入以及 相當優渥的退休制度,大學教授仍是讓人欣羨的職業。至於冒出雙薪教授問題,乃是法規與制度不完備所造成;與其攻擊個人,不如從立法著手,才是徹底解決之道。

 國內學界的問題,許多都與中研院有關,因此有幾篇文章的矛頭指向中研院。譬如中研院研究員不單享有充沛的院內經費,他們還同時申請國科會 計畫,與大學教授爭利。尤有甚者,由中研院主導的幾項國家型計畫更嚴重擠壓到國科會的經費,造成近年來個人計畫的大幅縮減;其中尤以私立院校的研究人員受 到的影響最大,造成人才與設備的雙重損失。

 個人在文章中指出:使用納稅人的錢從事研究,是學術中人的特權,不能視為理所當然。學術研究雖然不應講求齊頭式平等,但也不該讓少數人及單位享有過多資源,因而排擠其他更多人的研究機會。此外,中研院打著吸引與培養人才的幌子,不惜破壞體制,發明特聘研究員及國際研究生院,等於變相大學。至於荒謬且過時的中研院院士制度,更是引人詬病。這些都是中研院必須大刀闊斧興革之處。

 為了平衡與中研院的不對等待遇,也為了提升國 內大學在國際上排名,教育部乃有五年五百億邁向頂尖大學計畫之舉。錢多雖然好辦事,但也惹出許多問題,包括浮報碳粉匣支出、將研究經費中飽私囊,以及過分 重視SCI/SSCI期刊文章以量化研究成果等,引起的批評聲浪不斷。據個人觀察,批評多來自私立大學與社會科學學門,但很少看到受惠的國立大學及自然科 學學門提出反省檢討之聲。如此一來正落人口實:大家都忙於製造論文,無暇他顧,甚至連教學服務工作也可能馬虎應付過去。

 除了資源分配不均外,國內大學教育的問題還有一籮筐,像是新成立及改制的大學過多、十八分就可進大學;大學淪為職業訓練所、通識教育變成營養學分;學院與系所玩弄改名伎倆、實質則換湯不換藥;許多系所專任師資薄弱、以合聘兼任教師矇人,或採便宜手段,成立學程以招攬學生;資深教授忙於研究、疏於教學,資淺教授則蠟燭兩頭燒、教學研究難以兼顧等。

 雖然學界問題不少,但個人相信:有心把事情做好的人絕對占大多數,重點是要有個公平開放的環境,讓意見能充分溝通,個人的潛力也將得以發揮;要做到這一點,居上位者責無旁貸。

 (作者為生理學教授,科普作家)

張貼者: 人事物 於 下午6:36 沒有留言:
較新的文章 較舊的文章 首頁
訂閱: 文章 (Atom)

blogs by hanching chung

  • Books Birdviews 書海
  • 管理學新生
  • 城鄉歲月 What Time is This Place?
  • 日本 心得帖
  • 英國風 The Island Race
  • 譯藝
  • 漢語人行道:演變風貌
  • 英文人行道 et cetera, et cetera
  • 健康一生

網誌存檔

  • ▼  2026 (7)
    • ▼  10月 (1)
      • 呂冠緯 39 歲生日的下午,我在台大問 500 位學弟妹:「國小到高中用過均一的,請舉手。」大概八成...
    • ►  5月 (2)
    • ►  3月 (1)
    • ►  2月 (2)
    • ►  1月 (1)
  • ►  2025 (35)
    • ►  12月 (5)
    • ►  11月 (2)
    • ►  10月 (1)
    • ►  7月 (2)
    • ►  5月 (2)
    • ►  4月 (2)
    • ►  3月 (6)
    • ►  2月 (9)
    • ►  1月 (6)
  • ►  2024 (44)
    • ►  12月 (4)
    • ►  11月 (3)
    • ►  10月 (4)
    • ►  9月 (2)
    • ►  8月 (1)
    • ►  7月 (2)
    • ►  6月 (4)
    • ►  5月 (7)
    • ►  4月 (9)
    • ►  3月 (4)
    • ►  2月 (3)
    • ►  1月 (1)
  • ►  2023 (33)
    • ►  12月 (5)
    • ►  11月 (7)
    • ►  10月 (2)
    • ►  9月 (5)
    • ►  8月 (3)
    • ►  7月 (1)
    • ►  6月 (2)
    • ►  5月 (2)
    • ►  4月 (2)
    • ►  3月 (2)
    • ►  2月 (1)
    • ►  1月 (1)
  • ►  2022 (16)
    • ►  12月 (2)
    • ►  11月 (1)
    • ►  9月 (2)
    • ►  8月 (2)
    • ►  5月 (3)
    • ►  4月 (1)
    • ►  3月 (2)
    • ►  2月 (1)
    • ►  1月 (2)
  • ►  2021 (33)
    • ►  12月 (3)
    • ►  11月 (4)
    • ►  10月 (2)
    • ►  8月 (1)
    • ►  6月 (4)
    • ►  5月 (4)
    • ►  4月 (5)
    • ►  3月 (2)
    • ►  2月 (4)
    • ►  1月 (4)
  • ►  2020 (87)
    • ►  11月 (3)
    • ►  10月 (4)
    • ►  9月 (3)
    • ►  8月 (21)
    • ►  7月 (7)
    • ►  6月 (10)
    • ►  5月 (10)
    • ►  4月 (8)
    • ►  3月 (2)
    • ►  2月 (6)
    • ►  1月 (13)
  • ►  2019 (123)
    • ►  12月 (8)
    • ►  11月 (11)
    • ►  10月 (13)
    • ►  9月 (2)
    • ►  8月 (9)
    • ►  7月 (6)
    • ►  6月 (15)
    • ►  5月 (14)
    • ►  4月 (9)
    • ►  3月 (10)
    • ►  2月 (10)
    • ►  1月 (16)
  • ►  2018 (148)
    • ►  12月 (13)
    • ►  11月 (9)
    • ►  10月 (17)
    • ►  9月 (7)
    • ►  8月 (13)
    • ►  7月 (15)
    • ►  6月 (17)
    • ►  5月 (11)
    • ►  4月 (10)
    • ►  3月 (17)
    • ►  2月 (7)
    • ►  1月 (12)
  • ►  2017 (108)
    • ►  12月 (4)
    • ►  11月 (15)
    • ►  10月 (4)
    • ►  9月 (17)
    • ►  8月 (8)
    • ►  7月 (8)
    • ►  6月 (7)
    • ►  5月 (7)
    • ►  4月 (7)
    • ►  3月 (14)
    • ►  2月 (7)
    • ►  1月 (10)
  • ►  2016 (156)
    • ►  12月 (13)
    • ►  11月 (12)
    • ►  10月 (12)
    • ►  9月 (21)
    • ►  8月 (22)
    • ►  7月 (6)
    • ►  6月 (14)
    • ►  5月 (8)
    • ►  4月 (17)
    • ►  3月 (10)
    • ►  2月 (9)
    • ►  1月 (12)
  • ►  2015 (244)
    • ►  12月 (20)
    • ►  11月 (20)
    • ►  10月 (20)
    • ►  9月 (15)
    • ►  8月 (25)
    • ►  7月 (19)
    • ►  6月 (24)
    • ►  5月 (20)
    • ►  4月 (24)
    • ►  3月 (21)
    • ►  2月 (17)
    • ►  1月 (19)
  • ►  2014 (140)
    • ►  12月 (14)
    • ►  11月 (14)
    • ►  10月 (13)
    • ►  9月 (20)
    • ►  8月 (6)
    • ►  7月 (12)
    • ►  6月 (19)
    • ►  5月 (10)
    • ►  4月 (2)
    • ►  3月 (9)
    • ►  2月 (14)
    • ►  1月 (7)
  • ►  2013 (125)
    • ►  12月 (6)
    • ►  11月 (4)
    • ►  10月 (7)
    • ►  9月 (10)
    • ►  8月 (9)
    • ►  7月 (10)
    • ►  6月 (15)
    • ►  5月 (8)
    • ►  4月 (16)
    • ►  3月 (12)
    • ►  2月 (14)
    • ►  1月 (14)
  • ►  2012 (109)
    • ►  12月 (18)
    • ►  11月 (13)
    • ►  10月 (14)
    • ►  9月 (11)
    • ►  8月 (13)
    • ►  7月 (12)
    • ►  6月 (4)
    • ►  5月 (8)
    • ►  4月 (2)
    • ►  3月 (2)
    • ►  2月 (2)
    • ►  1月 (10)
  • ►  2011 (146)
    • ►  12月 (6)
    • ►  11月 (8)
    • ►  10月 (7)
    • ►  9月 (16)
    • ►  8月 (3)
    • ►  7月 (9)
    • ►  6月 (10)
    • ►  5月 (15)
    • ►  4月 (29)
    • ►  3月 (17)
    • ►  2月 (12)
    • ►  1月 (14)
  • ►  2010 (100)
    • ►  12月 (13)
    • ►  11月 (7)
    • ►  10月 (14)
    • ►  9月 (16)
    • ►  8月 (11)
    • ►  7月 (4)
    • ►  6月 (12)
    • ►  5月 (3)
    • ►  4月 (4)
    • ►  3月 (4)
    • ►  2月 (10)
    • ►  1月 (2)
  • ►  2009 (52)
    • ►  12月 (5)
    • ►  11月 (1)
    • ►  10月 (4)
    • ►  9月 (4)
    • ►  8月 (2)
    • ►  7月 (4)
    • ►  6月 (5)
    • ►  5月 (11)
    • ►  4月 (7)
    • ►  3月 (4)
    • ►  2月 (1)
    • ►  1月 (4)
  • ►  2008 (88)
    • ►  12月 (2)
    • ►  11月 (5)
    • ►  10月 (4)
    • ►  9月 (6)
    • ►  8月 (9)
    • ►  7月 (8)
    • ►  6月 (2)
    • ►  5月 (6)
    • ►  4月 (5)
    • ►  3月 (7)
    • ►  2月 (10)
    • ►  1月 (24)
  • ►  2007 (62)
    • ►  12月 (8)
    • ►  11月 (10)
    • ►  10月 (14)
    • ►  9月 (22)
    • ►  8月 (8)
  • ►  2005 (1)
    • ►  6月 (1)
簡單主題. 技術提供:Blogger.